Specialized legal assistance for entrepreneurs, organizations, and directors.
View all areas of expertiseLegal assistance with conflicts, claims, negotiations, and proceedings.
View legal assistanceLegal assistance with outstanding invoices, disputed claims, and collection proceedings.
View collectionMeet MKB Juristen, our founders, and the way we organize legal assistance for entrepreneurs.
About SME LawyersNFTs touch upon copyright, trademark law, and contract law simultaneously. Our mixed teams of lawyers and legal counsel advise on and litigate NFTs, blockchain, and the metaverse — from international corporations to the baker on the corner.
NFTs are digital tokens that are non-fungible and therefore unique. A cryptocurrency like Bitcoin is also a digital token; however, one Bitcoin is fully interchangeable with another. The interchangeability of a Bitcoin ensures that it does not matter which Bitcoin is owned. After all, the underlying value of one Bitcoin does not differ from that of another.
NFTs differ from other digital tokens in that interchangeability or substitutability is lacking. This makes NFTs unsuitable for containing cryptocurrency: after all, the core of a currency is the mutual interchangeability of coins. For this reason, NFTs are highly suitable for containing digital objects such as art or music. NFTs can also be used for digital value objects in, for example, games and virtual environments such as a metaverse. NFTs, like cryptocurrency, are connected to a blockchain and are therefore decentralized.
Blockchains have been around for a while now and are already part of many people's vocabulary. Nevertheless, here is a brief explanation of exactly what a blockchain is.
A blockchain is nothing more than an interactive, online, decentralized database. That might sound like a mouthful, but in essence, it is less complicated. A classic database stores information in the form of tables (think, for example, of how series of data can be entered into Excel). A blockchain stores information in a different way, namely in pieces or blocks. The moment a block is filled with information (for example, information about transactions), the block is permanently added to the chain. The difference in data storage is fundamental. In a normal database, one can change, delete, etc., individual data inputs. A blockchain is designed so that this is not possible. The moment a block of data is "attached to the chain," as it were, the data is immutable. Moreover, the blockchain creates a self-sufficient verification system for the data. A block must correspond to and match the entire timeline of the entire chain. As a result, 10 cannot suddenly become 100; in other words, data in the blockchain cannot be altered. Besides cryptocurrencies and NFTs, blockchain technology has many more applications. These applications are therefore becoming increasingly popular.
NFTs are widely used for digital art today. The creator of online art holds copyright on the creation, just as with physical art. When a buyer purchases digital art in the form of an NFT, what exactly is being purchased?
That depends entirely on the underlying smart contract. An NFT can:
The purchase of an NFT does not entail the transfer of copyright.
In principle, it can be agreed during the purchase or sale of physical art that the copyright is transferred upon the sale. However, this must involve a direct purchase of art from the copyright holder (the creator), because the copyright holder is the only one who can make the transfer legally valid. The moment a copyright has been transferred by the original creator, that copyright, like the art itself, is naturally marketable.
Technically, therefore, it should be possible to transfer copyright in the case of NFTs to the buyer. The problem, however, is that the purchase of NFTs takes place via so-called smart contracts on the blockchain. For the transfer of copyright, the Dutch Copyright Act requires a deed (Article 2). There is uncertainty as to whether the Dutch legislature or courts classify a smart contract as a deed within the meaning of the Copyright Act.
A Non-Financial Transaction (NFT) can infringe copyright. As a copyright holder, it is necessary to seek expert advice regarding the risks and possibilities. We have the knowledge and expertise to assume various roles: from advisory services to dispute resolution. We have an experienced team of lawyers and legal experts in the field of NFTs and intellectual property. Contact us to discuss the possibilities.
A common misconception is that an NFT is in itself an intellectual property right (IP right), comparable to copyright or trademark rights. This is not the case. An NFT is not an IP right, but a digital property certificate: a unique certificate of registration on the blockchain that refers to an underlying object. Anyone who buys an NFT acquires the economic entitlement to that token, but not automatically the underlying copyright, trademark right, or other IP right. Those rights remain with the creator or the rights holder, unless expressly agreed otherwise. This is because a valid transfer of an IP right always requires both a valid title and an act of delivery; mere possession of a token is insufficient for this. For the connection with other IP rights, we refer to our core expertise in Intellectual Property (IP Law).
In addition to copyright, trademark law is playing an increasingly important role in NFTs, virtual goods, and the metaverse. A trademark registered for physical products or services does not automatically protect the use of that trademark in the digital world. Therefore, trademark holders are increasingly registering their trademarks for virtual goods and services (in practice, often in Class 9 of the Nice classification for downloadable digital files and virtual goods). Anyone who uses an existing trademark in or associated with an NFT without permission risks trademark infringement: it is not permitted to use a sign that is identical to or resembles a registered trademark for similar goods or services. High-profile international proceedings concerning digital counterfeit products show that judges take trademark protection seriously in the virtual context as well. For entrepreneurs, this means two things: protect your own trademark in a timely manner for digital applications as well, and check before minting whether you are not using someone else's trademark.
Creating (minting) an NFT based on someone else's work is simple, but legally risky. Anyone who mints an NFT of a protected work without the permission of the rights holder and trades it directly infringes copyright and is liable for it. The rights holder can then claim, among other things, an injunction, damages, and disgorgement of profits. Moreover, in proceedings concerning infringement of intellectual property rights, a broader award of legal costs applies pursuant to Section 1019h of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure, meaning that the losing party, in principle, bears the full reasonable and proportionate legal costs of the opposing party. This makes it all the more important to thoroughly map out the chain of rights before minting or trading an NFT.
Since the purchase of an NFT does not, in principle, entail a transfer of copyright, it is important to carefully define the usage rights. The smart contract and its accompanying terms and conditions can specify exactly what the buyer is permitted to do: only personal use, or also commercial exploitation. Some projects opt for a broad license or even release via a Creative Commons license (including the CC0 model, in which the creator waives their rights). Additionally, many creators include a royalty arrangement in the smart contract so that they automatically receive a percentage upon every resale. Whether such a programmed royalty is legally enforceable, and how it relates to the statutory resale right of visual artists and the exhaustion of the distribution right after the first sale, is a matter that requires assessment on a case-by-case basis. A clear licensing and royalty structure prevents subsequent disputes between creator, platform, and buyer.
NFTs, blockchain, and the metaverse touch upon virtually the entire field of intellectual property law: copyright, trademark law, and the surrounding contract law. Our mixed teams of lawyers and (in-house) legal counsel advise and litigate in this area, ranging from the international corporation launching a global NFT collection to the baker around the corner seeking digital protection for their brand or design. We draft smart contract terms and licenses, register and enforce trademarks for digital applications, take action against infringing mints and counterfeiting, and advise on the risks and opportunities of blockchain applications. Please feel free to contact us to discuss the possibilities for your specific situation without obligation.
In specialized legal cases, it is not just about the legal rule. It is also about evidence, timing, negotiating position, and the business implications of every step.
We guide makers, buyers, platforms, and brand owners with all legal questions regarding NFTs and blockchain.
Anyone trading in NFTs without the proper agreements runs legal risks. This primarily concerns uncertainty regarding which rights are actually transferred and infringement of the rights of others.
We first map out the legal chain and your objectives, and then choose the most appropriate route: from solid contractual agreements and trademark registration to robust enforcement or litigation. By combining lawyers and in-house counsel, we serve both international corporations and small business owners pragmatically and cost-effectively.
A clear step-by-step plan, from initial consultation to solution.
We will briefly discuss the situation, the available documents, and your primary interests.
We assess your legal position, supporting documents, deadlines, and possible next steps.
You will receive concrete advice on the best course of action: responding, negotiating, settling, or litigating.
We assist with correspondence, negotiation, litigation strategy, or further legal assistance.
We combine legal analysis with practical experience in cases for entrepreneurs, directors, and organizations.
All our legal experts and lawyers possess broad knowledge of legislation regarding NFTs. In addition, they have specialized in one or more areas of focus within intellectual property law. We have organized several areas of focus into various practice groups. Each lawyer is part of one or more practice groups based on his or her specialism(s). Clients can go directly to the appropriate practice group for each case. Here, they are assisted by the lawyer or legal expert most suitable for the case. Where necessary, we draw upon the expertise and experience of our specialist colleagues from other practice groups.
Answers to the questions we receive most often about NFTs.
Legal advice is wise as soon as pressure arises, deadlines are running, an opposing party takes a position, or when the financial or strategic interests are significant.
Yes. We assess your legal position, advise on strategy, and can assist with correspondence, negotiation, defense, or further legal steps.
Specialist advice is provided on an hourly basis in principle. Where possible, we provide clarity in advance regarding the expected approach, costs, and next steps.
Yes. You can request a free consultation. We will briefly discuss your situation and indicate which course of action is likely the sensible one.
Contact our lawyers and legal experts without obligation for advice on NFTs, blockchain, and intellectual property.
Also view the other sections within this area of law.
Leave your details. We will contact you to briefly discuss your situation.
Want to know more about our services?
Then contact our specialists.