Shareholders' agreement at 50/50: additional points of attention for two equal partners

In a 50/50 BV, the shareholders' agreement is not an option but a life insurance policy. Statutory rules and standard articles of association do not include a built-in tiebreaker: in the event of any disagreement, the situation comes to a standstill, and with it, the BV. A good shareholders' agreement establishes in advance how to resolve that tie — before the silence between you exceeds the cost of a mediator.

Bram and Joris started a 50/50 partnership. It worked until it didn't. Three months without a decision, a mediator charging €200 an hour, and a friendship that suddenly turned into work. Since then, they haven't had a 50/50 partnership without a proper shareholders' agreement, nor do they do anything together unless a tie-breaker mechanism is in writing. In this article: why a 50/50 partnership is so risky, which clauses you really need to arrange, and why hiring a lawyer pays for itself faster here than elsewhere.

The short answer: 50/50 = standard deadlock risk

A 50/50 BV has one mathematical characteristic that makes it uniquely risky: there is no majority. In any meeting where you disagree, the decision remains stalled. No reserve order, no automatic deciding, no “I decide” by a third party — unless you have agreed to that yourselves. The statutory basic rules for BV decision-making are found in Book 2 of the Civil Code, but the law itself offers nothing for the tiebreaker.

Four common scenarios in which a 50/50 runs into trouble:

• Investment or major expenditure: one wants new machines, the other feels now is not the time.
• Staff: one wants to fire someone, the other wants to keep him.
• Strategy: internationalization, new product line, price changes — both parties veto.
• Dividend distribution: one wants to take the money out, the other wants to reinvest.

None of these situations is theoretical. You inevitably encounter all of them in a private limited company.

Which clauses are particularly important with a 50/50 split?

A good 50/50 shareholders' agreement contains everything a standard shareholders' agreement has, plus extra attention to these topics:

• Deadlock clause — mandatory. Phased: cooling-off, mediation, binding advice, and finally Russian roulette or a similar exit mechanism. See also deadlock clause in the shareholders' agreement.
• Casting vote / independent chairperson — for the General Meeting or the Board, for topics where stagnation is worst.
• Reserved matters with explicit fallback — if no majority is reached, the decision reverts to, for example, the status quo (no change), or to a pre-agreed default.
• Clear dividend policy — avoids the “withdrawal or reinvestment” debate by agreeing on a formula in advance (for example, distributing 50% of profit, reserving 50%).
• Clear division of roles on the board — who has the final say on operational matters? Who on strategy?
• Good leaver / bad leaver with sharp definitions — at 50/50, the exit of one of the parties is often the endpoint of the collaboration.

Russian roulette in a 50/50: the last resort

The most commonly used exit mechanism in a 50/50 deadlock is Russian roulette: one shareholder names a price, and the other chooses whether to buy or sell at that price. This works particularly well when both shareholders are in a similar financial position — otherwise, the less capitalized shareholder gambles incorrectly by either bidding too low (and being bought out for very little) or too high (and being unable to pay).

A few variants and alternatives:

• Texas shoot-out: blind bidding, highest bid wins. Requires mutually rational valuation.
• Mandatory sale to a third party: the entire BV is sold to an external party, and you divide the proceeds. Works well if the collaboration is unsustainable and the BV is saleable.
• Dissolution and liquidation: as a last resort, and only if both parties accept that the BV ceases to exist.

Establish the division of roles in advance

A second approach that often works in 50/50 limited liability companies: clearly defining the operational division of roles in advance, so that not every minor decision needs to go through both partners. For example:

• Shareholder A: responsible for commerce and marketing, may make decisions up to €25,000 without consultation.
• Shareholder B: responsible for operations and finance, may make decisions up to €25,000 without consultation.
• Above €25,000 or strategic decisions: joint consultation required.

This prevents you from having to attend a general meeting for every supplier selection or personnel matter. Also read who is authorized to sign on behalf of a company for the legal context.

What if you cannot choose 50/50?

A fair question from many entrepreneurs: “Shouldn’t we just do 51/49?” Sometimes yes, sometimes no. The pros and cons:

• 51/49 prevents a formal deadlock — there is always a majority for ordinary decisions.
• However, it does not solve everything: reserved matters requiring unanimity or a qualified majority remain deadlocked in the event of disagreement.
• It changes the psychology: the “majority shareholder” feels different from the “minority shareholder”, even though the difference is 2%.
• It works poorly for co-founders who want to be psychologically and operationally equal.

For two equal co-founders, a 50/50 split with a good shareholders' agreement is generally better than a forced 51/49. For other setups (one leading founder + supporting co-founder, or investor + founder), an unequal ratio is more logical.

Honest recommendation

A 50/50 without a shareholders' agreement is a life on the phone with your co-shareholder, hoping things don't go wrong. A 50/50 with a well-thought-out shareholders' agreement is a normal, workable collaboration in which each party knows there is a way out if things really get stuck. The shareholders' agreement costs a few hundred to just over a thousand euros; the first mediator alone costs more.

View the options for having your shareholders' agreement drafted or reviewed. For the broader overview: what is a shareholders' agreement; for the step-by-step plan: drafting a shareholders' agreement.

Frequently Asked Questions