MKB Juristen drafts custom legal documents
It is best not to cobble together or copy important contracts, terms and conditions, and other legal documents yourself. We help entrepreneurs on a budget with customized legal solutions, clear costs upfront, and practical explanations.
- Custom contracts, terms and conditions, and legal documents
- Budget-friendly and clear about the costs upfront
- Request a free consultation or a no-obligation quote
Employee monitoring — camera, email, GPS, screen monitoring — must comply with the GDPR (proportional, transparent, with a legal basis) and the Works Councils Act (Works Council consent for those over 50). Insufficient regulation results in a Data Protection Authority fine of up to 4% of global turnover plus employment law proceedings. For SMEs, it is a matter of striking a balance between employer interests (productivity, safety, fraud prevention) and employee privacy. Below are the rules and how Tessa manages monitoring in her warehouse.
The short answer
- GDPR requirements: lawful basis, transparency, proportionality, purpose limitation.
- Works Council consent: for 50+ employees via Art. 27 WOR.
- Inform employees: in advance, in writing, clearly.
- Employee privacy rights: access, rectification, objection.
- Sanctions: Data Protection Authority fine + employment law proceedings.
Types of monitoring
1. Camera surveillance
- Public space (shop, warehouse): often permitted for safety/theft prevention.
- Individual employee workplace: carefully considered, often not permitted.
- Changing rooms, toilets: never allowed.
2. Email and the internet
- General log files: permitted for security/audit.
- Content access to individual email: only in case of concrete suspicion, with procedure.
- Automated scanning (DLP, security): permitted on good grounds.
3. GPS tracking of commercial vehicles
- During work: permitted for route optimization, customer visits.
- Outside work: not permitted without a compelling reason.
- Access to historical data: limited to purpose.
4. Screen monitoring (productivity tools)
- Increasingly common when working from home.
- Often worth considering for SMEs — privacy impact significant.
- Employee information and Works Council consent are crucial.
GDPR requirements
1. Lawful basis
- Legitimate interest: for security, productivity (after balancing of interests).
- Consent: rarely applicable (power imbalance).
- Contract: for specific positions where monitoring is essential.
- Legal obligation: e.g. obligation to retain records.
2. Proportionality
- Monitoring must be proportionate to the objective.
- Choose the least invasive measure.
- Collect no more data than necessary.
3. Transparency
- Inform employees in advance: what, why, and how long it will be kept.
- Privacy statement update for monitoring.
- Inform the Works Council upon implementation.
4. Purpose limitation
- Use data only for the stated purpose.
- Not for other purposes (e.g. assessment) without new substantiation.
Works Council consent (Art. 27 Works Councils Act)
For 50+ employees: the Works Council has the right of consent regarding the introduction of monitoring rules. Procedure:
- Submit the proposed decision to the Works Council.
- OR has 4 weeks to respond.
- Upon approval: implementation possible.
- In case of refusal: the director may request substitute consent from the subdistrict court judge.
No Works Council: direct agreement with employees via communication.
Tessa's warehouse monitoring
Tessa has 12 employees — no Works Council, but monitoring:
- Cameras in warehouse (anti-theft): permitted, employees informed in advance.
- No cameras in the canteen, break room, or changing room.
- Email log files: only technical metadata.
- Content review of email: only in case of suspected concrete irregularity, following a management decision.
- Privacy statement contains monitoring information.
Tessa documents the decision and informs new employees during onboarding.
Sanctions for violation
- AP fine: up to 4% of global turnover or €20 million.
- Compensation: by the injured employee.
- Employment law: the employee can demand dissolution.
- Exclusion of evidence: unlawfully obtained evidence (e.g. camera footage) is not admissible in the proceedings.
Honest recommendation
For SME limited liability companies: minimize monitoring to what is strictly necessary. Inform employees clearly in advance. Document considerations and the decision. For structural monitoring: GDPR impact assessment and (for 50+ employees) Works Council consent. Combine with a good privacy statement and HR policy. In case of doubt: consult a GDPR lawyer (€500-€2,500) to draft the policy — this prevents fines and employment law issues.
For other topics: privacy statement, data breach and works council.
Frequently Asked Questions
Subject to conditions: lawful GDPR basis, proportionality, transparency, purpose limitation. For 50 or more employees: Works Council consent required (Art. 27 Works Councils Act). Informing employees in advance is essential.
Public spaces (shop, warehouse) are often permitted for safety/theft prevention. Individual employee workplace: heavily weighed, often not. Changing rooms, toilets: never. Employee information and sound substantiation are essential.
General log files (metadata) permitted for security purposes. Content-based access to individual emails: only in case of a concrete suspicion of irregularity, with a procedure (management decision, documentation). Not routinely.
Permitted during work for route optimization and customer visits. Not permitted outside of work without a compelling reason. Access to historical data limited to the purpose. Inform employees in advance.
Increasing with working from home — significant privacy impact. Often worth considering for SMEs, but subject to a rigorous GDPR assessment. Employee information and (for those over 50) Works Council consent are crucial. Minimally required and must be clearly substantiated.
AP fine of up to 4% of global turnover or €20 million, compensation to injured employee, employment law proceedings (dissolution), exclusion of evidence (illegally obtained evidence not admissible in proceedings).
For employees of 50 or more: yes, via Art. 27 of the Works Councils Act (WOR). Procedure: proposed decision to the Works Council, 4 weeks for a response; in case of refusal, substitute consent from the sub-district court. For employees under 50: direct agreement with the employees.